"Joy is what happens to us when we allow ourselves to recognise how good things really are."
I was this close to falling asleep after quite a long day (though 12PM to 2AM isn’t very long haha I’m deluding myself) and my brother asked me to look at my cousin’s FB photo album with those old photos and…
Was. Mindblown.
Since I never laid eyes on these old photos (which is why good photos must be developed or they’ll be gone in a click of the “delete” button).
First on the old-photos list:
My aunt and uncle during their dating days. All so pui-ti and hum-sum when young! Not saying that they’re not now, but now I know why so many people are obsessed with anti-aging.
My grandma carrying my eldest paternal cousin (表哥 – why English don’t make the gender divide clearer) and grandpa carrying my cousin (表姐 – see, Chinese just makes such things so much clearer). All. So. Young. My grandparents oh my goodness! (Though I’ve seen their couple portrait taken in their 20s – when neither had a single wrinkle – hung in their bedroom once.)
My other aunt (the sister of the one in the first picture) with my 表姐 and 表哥. (Sorry non-Chinese readers.) My aunt looked so young oh goodness!
(From left to right) My other cousin (the younger brother of my other 表哥), my brother (I’m pretty sure his days of obesity started right then – though it only became a problem when he could no longer pass them off as uber-cute baby fat), my father and mother and my cousin (表姐) at the zoo.
My grandpa and I! And I still remember those days when he really loved me but showed it in a very old-fashioned way. And his endless tidbits-buying that my siblings and I never quite appreciated. Sigh such regrets suffered when young are perhaps the only things that motivate people to continue loving the young (no matter how wayward they get) when they’re old.
My grandma and I! Sigh can’t believe she looked so youthful when I was an infant (as far as she was already a grandmother). Totally miss her and her patience and teachings towards my siblings and I. Grandma, we all turned out pretty well so don’t worry!
I guess when we come together as a family for Chinese New Year celebrations, let us not only remember the people who may have left us physically but left a lasting impact and had with us an emotional bond, but also appreciate those who are still around.
Happy Chinese New Year everyone! And stop obsessing over the ang-paos and gambling – there’s more to the festival!
I was speaking to 2 of my senior colleagues (not very senior – they were only a year older) and I told them that it was my first time working. And to my surprise, they were shocked.
“Really ar?! You never worked before ar?!”
And one went on to say that I am very lucky to be able to immerse myself in a hugely intellectual and educational environment – without much disruption – and so advance my grades and rise higher in the education system. And the other, after some talk I cannot quite recall, said that he would love to be in such a position, but sadly, he is not.
But he also said this (allow me to paraphrase): “But I do not think people like them (to avoid directly referring to me and so create a misunderstanding) are much smarter what – they may be book-smart but we are street-smart.”
I guess perhaps I am made, destined and called to be in the teaching career, but whatever it is, at my age, I already understand that this education system that we term as “first-world education” is actually not so impressive after all.
My personal stand when it comes to viewing people is that no one is really any more smarter than the other. I mean, did God on purpose make one much smarter than the other just so to place the former on the pedestal and shame the latter on the ground? Well, I don’t even think God made one smarter than the other in the first place.
Humans are judgemental. We seek to find the better. Which applies to sorting out the smarter from the dumber. And so the pioneers came out with a grudgedly indigestible word: examinations. Whether an obselete tribal practice of demanding that a coming-of-age boy carry a sizeable rock and run a circuit to prove his manhood (I still have not got my hands on Great Expectations argh), or a sophisticated imperial assessment in China’s old monarchies, we – or rather, they – chose to use the same ruler to measure the length of every thread.
But what if some threads had knots on them? What if some were coiled up? What if some were just in a jumble? Can you still use the ruler to measure the length? No. And there is no way of getting every thread straight (since this metaphor relates the individual threads to individual men – and therefore it makes no sense to wire every man to be equal in every discipline).
And somehow, we chose to inherit the principle of homogenised standards wholely (with a pittance of advancement) – in the name of fairness, maybe? Continuity? Regular social behaviour of mimicry? I do it because they did it?
The question is simply a big fat why.
Why does our education system grade every single individual based on narrow curricula, with criteria that allow only a selected group to thrive and excel? Those who do well could well be smart I cannot deny the credit endowed unto them, but does that mean those who fail by those standards set by traditionalist, irresponsible, short-sighted and close-minded people (the tone is excessive here, I know) are any less? And do consider the various fields where you can assess 2 individuals of vastly opposing “calibre”.
Sometimes I am really inclined to think that people who do well in the education system fits, and those who don’t just do not. And here comes the saying of the common man: “The exam failed me; I did not fail the exam.”
The economies simply further fuel such “ideals”. I need someone who is good in this, this and that. I devise a test to see if someone is good in this, this and that. And people who are not good in this, this and that, are deemed as crap. The dregs. Waiting to be discarded, or with greater hope, waiting to find a place where his or her potential and abilities can be better harnessed and propelled.
I am by no means saying that the idea of a standardised examination is total cuckoo-nanny baloney. We all need standardisation to tell who’s good and who’s bad (very much for the sake of pragmatism, rationality and anti-quixotism, as far as the idea of “good” and “bad” can be further questioned). But I believe we can use a variety of modes of assessment. We are all cognitively wired differently: the visual, auditory and kinaesthetic learners, just to offer a very simplistic framework. (I shall leave this aspect to curriculum and examination planners.)
And, greater than that, it is my personal belief (and I will stand by it for as long as it sounds credible to me) that no one person is any more or any less worthy than his or her neighbour. That means, I think all educators need to understand that every student is brilliant, in his or her own right.
And that is why I hate, and abhor, and loathe, and despise, and ridicule any educator who says in a definitive tone: “This student is hopeless.”
Who are you to pass such a cruel, unsympathetic and myopic judgement on any one person? (Not to mention the dissonance of that line itself, not just to the ear, but to the heart.) No one is a saint and can say that “I do not judge at all” but I’m sure the very least one can do is to control the thought and the tongue. Iron-clad stratification is not, and never, a right of man.
The hearts of the youthful are fragile and impressionable. An irresponsible educator could kill a person who once had great dreams that could one day change the world. I’m not saying that every student is like that, but can you afford to risk it, and bear the consequences?
And if an educator thinks he or she is, in all honesty, justified in making such statements, I think this person does not and should not deserve to be an educator, for the sake of salvaging the one or two.
We all need someone to believe in us, and no one has a null contribution in its entirety. And thus, I do not think we can afford to deny anyone the opportunity to thrive and fully utilise his or her gifts and competencies.
It deeply saddens me that some are conveniently deemed as bad. When I choose to strongly believe that in actuality they are not. We just stupidly choose to deem them as bad. And I still don’t know why.
Quoting from Marianne Williamson (as far as this is rapidly degenerating into a cliché): “We are born to make manifest the glory of God that is within us.”
I love my new blog theme and background.
I love my Twitter theme and design.
I love my desktop and laptop wallpapers.
And they are all so melancholic.
Which is perhaps why I love them so much.
It’s kind of late now (started this post at around 1.20AM – which is unearthly by holiday standards and surprisingly not by schooling standards) but just got to say my piece. (And so this post would be in English as simple and direct as possible.)
Went back for AJC Open House with the choir peeps (Jessica, Shaun, Xuanzhen, Huisze and James) and firstly, just got to say that the school just got from ugly to uglier. They repainted the school, but not the entire school, so now the school has random patches of oh-so-bright-and-gaudy yellow at the humble entrance. And we smartly deduced the school used the leftover paint from the hostel, in an attempt to make the school look “newer” for Open House. Not being a cynic here, but in my opinion, that paint job was totally dispensable. Oh well, quoting from Ms Quek, “At least you can see that the paint is new.” (Please don’t get her into trouble – the fact that the school is old is synonymous so don’t try to deny it.)
Walked in, and wanted to say hi to the friendly security uncle (always bumped into him in the toilet outside LT5 and always had small meaningless chat – which works miracles in building budding friendships) but guessing he does the morning shift. Ain’t going to come to school early just to saw hi.
And then bumped into Mr Guru, who was driving out of school with Mr Andy Lim (yes, I waved to him when I saw his car approaching and smartly stood near the middle of the road so he had no way of escaping) and as usual he asked: “How are you?” So went on about what I was doing and when I would be enlisting (and repeated the same story with a lot of other people, ranging from HOD/Arts and Social Sciences to boss of Veggie Lover i.e. auntie who cooks great hashbrowns and lady’s fingers). Hmmm let’s see how long he can remember me, though I must say he did pretty well in remembering names. After all, he only took me for my J1 year.
Walked to the foyer and got a goodie bag (which had not much in there, since stuff started to run out so the bag was probably the most valuable item) from a hospitable J2 (I am officially J3 thanks), though his friend (AJChoir junior, you’re not as hospitable huh?) reminded him that I am a senior. Oh well, can’t cry over split milk. Once you’ve given it to me, it’s mine forever!
Then had lunch in the canteen (not a wise choice but it created chances to talk to the stall aunties!) and had a chat with the Veggie Lover auntie! And apparently she said my $8/hour job (sadly docked to $7 though) paid better than hers. I don’t believe.
Then met Mr Kwei outside the hall while he was leaving! Didn’t really chat much though, since Mrs Ong just so happened to walk past and I just had to greet her! The most patient and concerned (synonymous with worrisome) teacher I have ever had! Such a nice lady!
And then went to the hall to watch AJChoir perform their repertoire (after making jokes with them about joining them on stage prior to their performance, since I was also in choir tee) and I must say I was impressed! Perhaps they were singing Northern Lights (which doesn’t require the producing of full, assertive sounds that easier exposes the technique level of choristers), but nonetheless their sound impressed me a lot! Good quality despite a small group! Am proud and thankful of you kiddos (and that’s all I’ll say since I’ve already said my piece in the choir room)!
Also met Ms Lee (yay got a picture with her – the nicest, gentlest and most sympathetic choir teacher-in-charge) and Ms You! And Ms Lee initially wanted to catch me for my hair. No chance man!
Have to specially mention the new (and sadly, only – I wonder who I should blame this time – sigh, office politics) DSA! I have never seen a person with such mega eyes oh gosh. And it’s a he. Wow. Anyway, I could see that he didn’t quite enjoy the session of roaming and resting and roaming and resting, so had to assure him: “It would get better.” Much more imperative since he’s new and we wouldn’t want him losing steam so soon (and biting his own finger asking why on earth he chose AJChoir). And as per other St. Gabriel’s boys I know, he knows my aunt (who owns a stall there) and so I proudly introduced myself as her nephew. And he (and all other St. Gabriel’s boys) has eaten my aunt’s noodles and I haven’t. I have no idea why this is happening.
And oei, Tenor juniors, if you are reading this, can you do more to integrate him into the section and make him feel welcome? Leaving him solely to a Bass senior (by no means alluding to the age-old Tenor-Bass rivalry) isn’t such a great idea, in my opinion. Thanks.
And when we were leaving, we met Ms Quek! Yay best Economics teacher ever! And her new hair makes her look a lot younger and brighter! Had a friendly chat (since “alumni” means an upgrade in seniority from puny “students”) and talked about our new principal (just a little – he was only there for 15 days, though I heard from kiddos that he speaks really slowly). And sad to say, Ms Leong wouldn’t be coming back to AJC on Results Day since she has TJC to tend to. Booo~
Finally ended off my day with yet another small-talk session with the LT1 Bookshop uncle and auntie! A lot of meaningless talk but then again, works miracles… (blah blah blah just scroll up don’t make me retype it.)
And in this one day, I’m sure I’m now public enemy of AJC Council since I said not-so-edifying stuff about them (made worse by 2 Twitter accounts who tweeted/retweeted my words). Don’t bash me please I’m still a harmless senior~ (Though I still think what I said is not far from the truth, but for peace’s sake…)
Till we meet again, AJC. (You still give me nightmares, but I’d rather have nightmares than completely erase all memories that happened in that fateful place.)
I am so filled with sympathy for those J1s going up to be J2s officially tomorrow.
I mean, I have been through all those pains of studying, and failing, and expecting, and disappointing – it’s all in a day’s work. But the aches of a day’s work never stays for just that day. A shoulder ache doesn’t go off just when your load has been taken off. It takes a long period of time to recuperate, to nurse, and to prevent another heavy load on it, before the ache goes away.
And definitely, the horror of those tough periods still sticks around, and never fails to haunt me and scare me whenever I think of it.
I deeply fear my JC education, but yet it has become a part of me. I have no idea how to express this complicated state of mind that I do not try to evade and remove that fear and instead live in it, but I guess there is too much at stake to forget.
My heart goes out to all those who are starting their second year tomorrow – especially to my juniors, and you have my best wishes.
You are stuck for another year, so your job is not to get rid of it, but to find a way to make it your best shot ever.
Quoting from Home (2008) by Marilynne Robinson:
“Every Sunday when the boys were home her father would stand at the front of the church, waiting for the pews to fill. Her brothers would file in, three of them, and her father would wait a moment more, watching the doorway, glancing up at the balcony. Then his head would fall to one side, regret and forgiveness in one gesture. Sometimes, rarely, he would nod to himself and smile, and then they knew that Jack was there, and that the sermon would be about joy and the goodness of God no matter what the text was. She had never heard her father say such hard words – the cruelty of it! the arrogance! – and she had never seen him brood and mutter for days at a time, as if he were absorbing the fact that some transgressions are beyond a mere mortal’s capacity to forgive. How often those same hard, necessary words had come to her mind.”
A distant uncle of mine just passed away a few days ago.
But what’s making me sad or feeling sorry is not the death of this uncle of mine (after all, I met him, perhaps, twice in my life?), but rather, the death of those lives that have lived through so much, and died countless times as a result.
What really makes death so depressing, and so regretful? It is that these old souls, who have lived through decades, slogging their lives, offering their hearts, buffeting their bodies and minds for the aspirations and expectations of oneself, and of others, end up in opulently embellished graves, still carrying names known for their ordinary legacies, that constantly sought to make a difference. The notion of failure, and the regret and guilt burdening the tired shoulders of these courageous men and women who chose (or were forced) to keep living their lives in the most noble and gratifying form amidst the normalcy that makes life a life after all, is in itself plagued with bitterness and a pain rendered by a cruel and unforgiving sense of non-fulfilment.
Trying is a tiresome affair. A risky investment that never guarantees a fruitful return. Yet these old souls kept going, and kept failing.
The unspoken and unspeakable sadness that garners no interest in the audience, no matter how mighty a listening ear might be, makes these failures a maggot on the constantly strengthening minds of these heroes. Where they get the strength, I have no idea.
A heart kept pumping and pumping, till one day it grew tired, and finally came to a halt, and it was over.
“Sometimes the strongest people in the morning are the ones who cry themselves to sleep at night.”
“To err is human; to forgive, divine.”
Mr Boughton (the pastor in Home) regretted, and yet forgived. He forgave the prodigal son, Jack, who constantly stabbed his father’s already scarred heart, still bleeding and still healing from the wounds of the past. Is this not cruelty to put a dying old man through such pain, galvanised by a façade of hope and peace that the frail elder has been clinging on, wishing one day, just once, that his wish would come true? And is it not cruelty to make this man perform the divine act of forgiveness? He was, in several staccatos of his life, a relatively satisfied man, dragged down by disappointment, spiritual condemnation, and his very own dreams and desires.
It is no wonder why my uncle simply could not let go of the fact of dying at a mere 53 years of age. He was saddened by his dreams and desires, and saddened by the pain of non-fulfilment. And saddened, by the fact that his dreams and desires would never completely become reality, and the pain of non-fulfilment would never morph into the joy of satisfaction. And saddened ever more, because he keeps trying.
A belated Happy New Year peeps! You are now a year older.
I thank God that death is not the final rite of passage, and I have a place in Heaven. And Heaven, given its nomenclature, means nothing of this all. I am still a happy boy. Would you be happy?
“A caterpillar thought the world was going to end till it realised it became a butterfly.”
I see something that reminds me of you and makes me miss you.
And I then ask myself why do I miss you.
And then I realised why do I miss you.
(Yes all I understand is “I don’t understand.” The rest don’t quite make sense.)
The shuttle bus driver from the hotel to Sea World in Orlando said this while conversing with 2 other passengers: “I was going through a rough patch and my mother gave me this plague that said, ‘A caterpillar thought the world was going to end till it realised it became a butterfly.’”
If you ask me, I think putting “coherence” as a marking criterion for essays is alright, though if I were to twist it a little, it might become superficiality.
Well, my point is that the search for coherence is actually futile (when extrapolated to encompass and describe the human mind) – simply because incoherence is innate, an enduring human condition, and an aspiration (which means there lies a gap between what we are and what we want).
The search for coherence is a figment of our overall search for stability and constancy amidst our volatile and impermanent lives that are, not to mention, plagued with a concoction of a million different things that come our way and confuse us.
And out of this search to be coherent, we always strive to be consistent – consistent in our actions, consistent in our rhetoric, consistent in our perspectives. When we find that this particular individual seems to act in ways where there is some contradiction, the judgemental being in every one of us is more than ready to stamp on that person: “two-faced”, “not trustworthy”, “deceptive” etc.
I am more inclined to think that coherence is impossible. Being born with the ability to empathise, our mindsets can be influenced over time, with interaction with other people who are most likely to carry different thoughts and understandings towards a certain issue or concept. Indeed, we can and we do take sides, but nothing quite perseveres till the end of the day. I do not think absolutism has any room with regards to the human psyche.
Cogency helps us to make sense of things, achieve a logical flow, sustain an argument. But unless we are able to conceptualise the overwhelmingly immense universe and its many constituents and inhabitants in a logical manner, accounting for the various (an understatement through and through) ambiguities, which is perhaps at the very least impossible, we cannot achieve cogency. Period.
I see no point in seeking coherence – at least when it comes to facing fellow humans. Too many things determine why we act, how we act, what we say, why we say, and, lo and behold, the magic hands of fate comes and lets some be seen and some be unseen.
Instead, I would subscribe to the pragmatist ideal – people always do something for a reason, whatever it may be. And hence, go forth and empathise and understand why he or she may do or say something.
A person carries too many identities and façades, especially in modern context: the Twitter self, the Facebook self, the blogging self, the superficial self, the emotional self, the speaking self, the thinking self, the self that others see, the self that he or she sees, the self that he or she aspires to see. To make sense of one, you have to make sense of all.
Go ahead and have fun man~ I wish you luck.
Let’s not try to frequently seek coherence and readily sound the alarum when we notice something that may not fit into the entire clockwork. Well, deception and farce definitely exists, but to let the paranoia and anxiety of it all blur our abilities of trust and simplicity – I think it’s not quite worth the deal. Rather, attempt to understand why others may behave or speak in certain ways – we were given the power to sympathise and empathise for a reason!
And of course, this post will definitely have spots of incoherence and negligence, thereby failing to consider certain things, but this is what I see, and it is, for sure, liable to change and moulding.
Perhaps this is why I always think I cannot live without God – He is the only One who doesn’t change and is ever consistent. At least a major form of stability is found! And perhaps that is why there is a void in us none can fill except one who is the Alpha and the Omega!
Ending off, quoting Heraclitus’ over-quoted line (that is almost degraded and decomposed to being a cliché): “Change is the only constant.” And Plato’s less-known line (something I might use for a greater length of time): “All is flux and nothing stays still.”
(Wapiang I just found out Plato quoted that line from Heraclitus! Duped for so long…)
Living in a physical world where there are 2 mutually exclusive worlds – you are either one or the other; if you’re not my friend, you’re my enemy; you have to choose one and lose the other. French philosopher and writer Voltaire pioneered in such thought: “… If this is best of possible worlds… all is for the best…” (Though the Bible totally preceded him and stated this upon the existence of mankind.)
It is impossible to oscillate between the 2 worlds. Louie, perceived as an oppressor, absolutist and dualistic in her ways, in Oranges Are Not The Only Fruit, got it right this time: “She had never heard of mixed feelings. There were friends and there were enemies.” That’s right – there are no mixed feelings.
And living through the B&W nature of the entire conceivable universe has been tough. Not tougher, just plain tough.
Why is there a need to be cronies with the world when all one should ever seek is to be a disciple of God? Why is there a need to belong in a hedonistic world that precisely seems more pleasant simply because it is so? Why do people build their identities upon shaky ground that will eventually grow old and pass away? Why is it so human to dwell in sin when it has been convened: “No it is wrong, it is called sin”? And the tough part comes when one world thinks likewise and the other thinks otherwise.
Following the soft gentle whisper of God’s voice amidst the loud clustered noise compounded by temptation, relativity, pride, indolence, disbelief. I keep getting lost.
Questioning the faith is not a bad thing – questions seek answers, and answers build the hitherto shaky faith on more solid ground.
I walk by faith and not by sight. Aye, I’d rather be blind.
I can’t imagine life without God, and I hope that one day, you will feel the same too.
I love blogging – it constantly places my heart at ease.
I feel like a drifter. And not by choice but by circumstance. It was a sad story.
I tried my best to keep up. I dragged my feet bound by the shackles of burden, attempted to follow and catch up, but the fleet moved forward so fast that the rifts simply got wider and more apparent.
So I got left behind. Left to wander and navigate the wilderness by myself, no guidance, no directions, catching the next train that comes along, hoping it brought me to my destination. But ah, wrong train again, you got to alight and try another route and again hope that it brings you to where you always wanted to go.
I believe Ruth and Sylvie never chose to sojourn; Fingerbone failed them, and they were then forced to leave to protect their heart and soul and ride the freight cars to find a place where they would be accommodated.
It was always a game of trial-and-error, a game of roulette, a game of blackjacks – just trying my luck again, but losing every single time till alas, I win a game and leave the casino satisfied and victorious.
The fleet always seemed abnormal, each with more than a pair of hands, able to grapple with the thousands of strands of thread, each tied to a part of their lives: one to their dreams, one to their aspirations, one to their soul, one to their loved one, one to their family, one to their faith, one to their expectations, one to their emotions.
But I realised, I got a pair of hands too.
Perhaps it’s just me with poor hand-eye coordination – I just let go of the thousand strands of thread, letting them wriggle away and fall off the cliff.
And with my now free pair of hands, I just plug in, hope for the best, hope for the end, clutch my hands and pray.
Image Credits: FB
And pray that this entire fiasco is that one stone that God has allowed to hit me for His divine purpose.
And pray that I would finally learn to coordinate my eyes and hands, and hold the life together.
And finally, pray for that one win that made my trip to the casino worthwhile.
I may not have found the train that took me to my Aslan’s country in Narnia (i.e. Heaven; CS Lewis was a Christian writer), but the ironic thing about pessimism: it’s optimistic – you can’t get any worse from there can you.
Ruth and Sylvie left, but when they found their own treasure, weren’t they on a roll?
Hope is both pessimistic and optimistic. Just depends on whether you look down or look ahead.
Blog at WordPress.com. Theme: Nishita by Brajeshwar.